<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Cadence</title>
		<link>http://kindredinkwriters.forumotion.net/cadence-f10/-t1.htm</link>
		<description>Meaningful, deliberate rhythms and pauses that cause writing to flow smoothly, and carry tone; mixed with syntax, cadence often expresses the writer or character's voice.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:49:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>I Heard You the First Time</title>
			<link>http://kindredinkwriters.forumotion.net/cadence-f10/i-heard-you-the-first-time-t11.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Jae Baeli</dc:creator>
			<description>...Repetition as enemy to style and cadence.



Even great writers make mistakes. I can usually tell when it's an editing oversight, or the fault of the author. An editor's oversight seems a simultaneous contradiction, in that it can mean &quot;overlook&quot;, but also &quot;seeing-over,&quot; as in monitoring--same word, two opposite meanings. Accordingly, when I use the word &quot;mistake&quot; in this context, it doesn't necessarily imply the condition of being WRONG. I use the word, &quot;mistake&quot;  ...</description>
			<category>Cadence</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:49:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://kindredinkwriters.forumotion.net/cadence-f10/i-heard-you-the-first-time-t11.htm#12</comments>
			<guid>http://kindredinkwriters.forumotion.net/cadence-f10/i-heard-you-the-first-time-t11.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>